Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics · California

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA

Pico Rivera, CA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics workplace, earning a grade A.

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA safety composite

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2020

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314120 · Pico Rivera, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #1/17
  • PHOTO Matouk Textile Works…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matouk Textile Works, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA falls in its industry

97 Cushions (except carpet, sprin establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 17 Cushions (except carpet, sprin employers in California.

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA (57 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA
Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA (57 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - CA has fewer employees than the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314120 · CA · Pico Rivera

97 Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Pico Rivera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matouk Textile Works, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Interiors, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Textile Brownsville Manufacturing 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2886 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pico Rivera - Bld: 0444 - 15 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2886 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR PICO RIVERA (AK) - 15 462 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : PHL - Philadelphia 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Waters Corporation Milford, MA and Field 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ERA Golden, CO 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chestnut Service Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 164 Pleasant Prairie Wi 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGC - Waukegan Plant 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : RDM - Redmond-Bend 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaiser Electrical Contractors, Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.