Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Pacific Gardens

Santa Clara, CA · ~67 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Gardens runs at 380% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Gardens: 14.4 TCR = 380% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Gardens safety composite

Pacific Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 37% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Gardens: 4.1 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 62.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2024

Pacific Gardens's TCR rose 0.9 from 4.1 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 62.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Santa Clara, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 380% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #494/635
  • PHOTO Artis Senior Living …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artis Senior Living of West Shore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Gardens averages 14.4 TCR (380% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Gardens TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=33.2 · 2021=20.4 · 2022=62.5 · 2023=30.5 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Pacific Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #494 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Pacific Gardens (67 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Gardens
Pacific Gardens (67 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Pacific Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2023 30.5 30.5 0 17 0
2022 62.5 62.5 1 36 0
2021 20.4 20.4 3 8 0
2020 33.2 31.6 1 20 1
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Santa Clara

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Santa Clara, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of West Shore 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lodge Assisted Living and Memory Care Community 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Junction City Retirement and Assisted Living 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Meadowlands 14.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Campus 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pure Storage 5,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120751 3,887 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620751 3,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Reliance Mfg Corporation 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Silver Lake 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Alton, IL - Fire 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking Engineering and Development 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Fagan Company 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50027 - Capstone Kroger Aurora 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knf Crp 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shasta Beverages Inc Tukwila 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.