Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing · California

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc

Sacramento, CA · ~55 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc: 5.6 TCR = 171% of Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc safety composite

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2017→2024

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc injury rate improved

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc's TCR fell 7.3 from 10.5 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.5 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 171% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #26/67
  • PHOTO Terzo Gresham
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terzo Gresham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc averages 5.6 TCR (171% of the Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc TCR series: 2017=10.5 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc falls in its industry

952 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufa establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 67 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufa employers in California.

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc (55 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc
Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc (55 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Pacific Pallet Exchange, Inc has more employees than the Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 3.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 16.5 16.5 3 1 0
2017 10.5 7.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · CA · Sacramento

952 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terzo Gresham 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood Inc. -New Hope 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lima Pallet Company 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSB Solutions dba Peregrine Wood Products 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Calloway's Store 123 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 510 EL Paso Food Service Warehouse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington MD FXFE-WMD 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR University of Maryland Medical Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cross Excavation Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1046 - Tullahoma Distribution 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Little Mountain Precision LLC - Tyler Plant 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cbtmm 14750 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.