Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · California

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter

San Jacinto, CA · ~215 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter: 8.2 TCR = 249% of Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter safety composite

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter: 5.1 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2020

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter's TCR rose 6.3 from 5.1 in 2017 to 11.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · San Jacinto, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 249% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #78/98
  • PHOTO Arrow/Laceyville
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arrow/Laceyville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter averages 8.2 TCR (249% of the Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2020=11.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter falls in its industry

1,158 Canopies, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 98 Canopies, sheet metal (except employers in California.

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter (215 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter
Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter (215 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pacific Sheet Metal/ Pacific Raingutter has more employees than the Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.4 11.4 2 0 0
2017 5.1 5.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · San Jacinto

1,158 Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 30 employers in San Jacinto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arrow/Laceyville 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syr-Tech Perforating Co. 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camarillo 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-Eastside 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 622 SAN MARCOS 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE YC Trucking 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA San Jacinto 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 196 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soboba Casino 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5425 503 FTE
NAT-TCR Madison branch 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6 Paramus, Nj 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Carberry Senior Living Center 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Biogen Drug Product 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hart Components LLC 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victor Manufacturing 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Digital Room LLC - Arlington Location 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.