Ship repair done in a shipyard · California

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc.

San Diego, CA · ~207 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ship repair done in a shipyard workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc.: 7.2 TCR = 218% of Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. safety composite

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2021

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. injury rate improved

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 4.5 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.5 · 2018=11.0 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #36/52
  • PHOTO PACSHIP North
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~207 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PACSHIP North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. averages 7.2 TCR (218% of the Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=11 · 2019=7 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. falls in its industry

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 52 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers in California.

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. (207 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc.
Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. (207 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. has more employees than the Ship repair done in a shipyard median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.1 4.1 6 0 0
2020 9.3 4.1 18 0 0
2019 7.0 5.8 12 0 0
2018 11.0 8.4 19 2 0
2017 4.5 3.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · CA · San Diego

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PACSHIP North 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GDIT Chesapeake Crossways Blvd 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEPFER MARINE, INC. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Dynamics Kings Bay 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Touchstone Pistachio, Co. 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Ontario S/C 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veteran Pipeline Construction 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR H&S Bakery Operations 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Construction Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1016 - Northwest Albuquerque Nm Whse 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henry F. Teichmann, Inc. 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cameron 4800 W Greens Rd 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sabert Corporation Kentucky 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZOLY 207 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.