Salt (except table) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt

Milwaukee, WI · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Salt (except table) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt: 4.8 TCR = 147% of Salt (except table) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt safety composite

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt: 4.1 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt's TCR rose 1.5 from 4.1 in 2023 to 5.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO Dover Chemical Corpo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dover Chemical Corporation Hammond Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt averages 4.8 TCR (147% of the Salt (except table) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt TCR series: 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt falls in its industry

485 Salt (except table) manufactur establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Salt (except table) manufactur employers in Wisconsin.

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt (35 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt
Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt (35 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Pak Technologies - 35th and Capital - Salt has fewer employees than the Salt (except table) manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.1 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · WI · Milwaukee

485 Salt (except table) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dover Chemical Corporation Hammond Works 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Chemical Company - Plant 1 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5924_12946 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ralph Santore & Sons, Inc. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eau Claire Energy Cooperative 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE C00280-Josheph Campbell CO Milwaukee WI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Hite 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Manufacturing - 01 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Edsal Manufacturing 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 89-Usf-Olf Lawrenceville 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanford Brothers Company Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoge Lumber Company 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA White Plains 240 Airport Rd 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Ontario 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Buildings LLC. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.