General medical and surgical hospitals · Oklahoma

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa

Tulsa, OK · ~223 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa: 11.8 TCR = 157% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa safety composite

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2190.3

2016→2024

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa injury rate improved

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa's TCR fell 2190.3 from 2197.8 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11956.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2197.8 · 2017=11956.5 · 2018=17.6 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=9.4 · 2024=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.8 · 157% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #94/96
  • PHOTO Rural Wellness Fairf…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rural Wellness Fairfax Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa averages 11.8 TCR (157% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa TCR series: 2016=2197.8 · 2017=11956.5 · 2018=17.6 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=9.4 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 7.5

Where PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 96 General medical and surgical h employers in Oklahoma.

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa (223 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa
PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa (223 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 3.2 7 0 0
2022 9.4 7.0 7 1 0
2021 12.6 8.8 10 0 0
2018 17.6 15.1 14 0 0
2017 11956.5 8695.6 11 0 0
2016 2197.8 1198.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · OK · Tulsa

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rural Wellness Fairfax Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Methodist Continuing Care Hospital (Katy, TX) 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ketchikan Medical Center 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knapp Medical Center 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ducommun - Tulsa 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shawnee Milling Company 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil States Industries 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE MESA Products, Inc. 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Exo-s Howe 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Baldwin Development LLC dba Baldwin Demolition 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR EGUSD Transportation Department 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Perishables Warehouse 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norrell Construction 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sugar Land 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluffton Regional Medical Center 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Full-Tilt Contracting, LLC 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.