Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location · Texas

Sugar Land

Sugar Land, TX · ~223 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Land runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location workplace, earning a grade B.

Sugar Land: 2.1 TCR = 70% of Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Land safety composite

Sugar Land scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sugar Land held a steady TCR band

Sugar Land's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722515 · Sugar Land, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/20
  • PHOTO Newark
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newark (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sugar Land in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugar Land averages 2.1 TCR (70% of the Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugar Land TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sugar Land falls in its industry

245 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 20 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, employers in Texas.

Sugar Land (223 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugar Land
Sugar Land (223 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sugar Land has more employees than the Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 18.8 12.6 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722515 · TX · Sugar Land

245 Beverage (e.g., coffee, juice, soft drink) bars, nonalcoholic, fixed location employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 147 employers in Sugar Land, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newark 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 362 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 125 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORD Joint Venture/O'Briens Restaurant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chase Center Office 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norrell Construction 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE James Construction Group LLC -Belton, Tx 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ameripack Foods LLC 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 77,810 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 5,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlumberger Sugar Land South 1,934 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,931 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson County 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Equipment & Crew, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassus - Savannah 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bluffton Regional Medical Center 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyco Field Services, LLC 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lyle Machinery 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAM Specialty Hospital of Tulsa 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.