Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Panda Sherman Power, LLC

Sherman, TX · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panda Sherman Power, LLC runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Panda Sherman Power, LLC: 1.4 TCR = 113% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panda Sherman Power, LLC safety composite

Panda Sherman Power, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Panda Sherman Power, LLC held a steady TCR band

Panda Sherman Power, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Sherman, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/86
  • PHOTO Harrington/Nichols S…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harrington/Nichols Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Panda Sherman Power, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panda Sherman Power, LLC averages 1.4 TCR (113% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panda Sherman Power, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Panda Sherman Power, LLC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Panda Sherman Power, LLC (28 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Panda Sherman Power, LLC
Panda Sherman Power, LLC (28 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Panda Sherman Power, LLC has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Sherman

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 121 employers in Sherman, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harrington/Nichols Station 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Virginia Generating Station 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Generation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amos 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Angels of Care Pediatric Home Health 6,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherman Case Rdy Plant 1,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson N. Jones Regional Medical Center 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherman 675 FTE
NAT-TCR Tupelo IMA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ULS Conshohocken 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR First Quality Baby Products NE 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Round Barn Brewery & Public House 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hudson Valley Glass & Metal Works, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hi Grade Gin Corporation 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koehn Construction Services, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4192-00051423-LVG 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.