Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers · Florida

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL: 1.4 TCR = 67% of Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL safety composite

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL held a steady TCR band

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/122
  • PHOTO Pengate Handling Sys…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pengate Handling Systems Inc - York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pantropic Power Inc - FTL averages 1.4 TCR (67% of the Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Pantropic Power Inc - FTL falls in its industry

2,560 Engines, internal combustion ( establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 122 Engines, internal combustion ( employers in Florida.

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL (29 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pantropic Power Inc - FTL
Pantropic Power Inc - FTL (29 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Pantropic Power Inc - FTL has fewer employees than the Engines, internal combustion (except air median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

2,560 Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pengate Handling Systems Inc - York 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renew Valve & Machine 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global Underground Mining, LLC - Bluefield 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Intercoastal Water Way 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE RB Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE JW Turf Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heart of Florida Greenhouses, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Gardens Citrus Nursery, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Kraft Heinz Food Company 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SPM-ODFL 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Mart # 73 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coastal Growers Supply INC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHR- West Main Willimantic 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Center 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAD-ODFL 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.