Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Par-Kut International, Inc.

Harrison Township, MI · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Par-Kut International, Inc. runs at 465% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Par-Kut International, Inc.: 15.4 TCR = 465% of Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Par-Kut International, Inc. safety composite

Par-Kut International, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Par-Kut International, Inc. injury rate improved

Par-Kut International, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.0 from 16.0 in 2016 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 30.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.0 · 2017=30.5 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=20.7 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Harrison Township, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 465% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO PBS Holdings Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PBS Holdings Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Par-Kut International, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Par-Kut International, Inc. averages 15.4 TCR (465% of the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Par-Kut International, Inc. TCR series: 2016=16 · 2017=30.5 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=20.7 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=11 · BLS 3.3

Where Par-Kut International, Inc. falls in its industry

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Buildings, prefabricated metal employers in Michigan.

Par-Kut International, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Par-Kut International, Inc.
Par-Kut International, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Par-Kut International, Inc. has fewer employees than the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 6.6 5 0 0
2023 18.4 13.8 7 1 0
2022 6.8 4.5 2 1 0
2020 20.7 11.5 8 1 0
2019 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2018 13.2 4.4 6 0 0
2017 30.5 17.4 11 3 0
2016 16.0 11.4 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · MI · Harrison Township

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 6 employers in Harrison Township, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PBS Holdings Inc 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Design-Build, LLC. 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rubb Buildings Systems 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Sheds, Inc. Corporate 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Macomb 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee County Water & Waste Services 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Ragnone Treatment Plant 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrison 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00622 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake St. Clair Metropark 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMS CAT OF MICHIGAN LLC 83 FTE
NAT-TCR IronTiger - Macungie 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0533 Hartsdale 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kraiburg Holding 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-States Packaging Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infitec, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melway Paving 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ball Pipe & Supply, Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.