Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Arizona

Paramount Designs, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ · ~104 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paramount Designs, Inc. runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Paramount Designs, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paramount Designs, Inc. safety composite

Paramount Designs, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

Paramount Designs, Inc. injury rate improved

Paramount Designs, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 2.4 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/47
  • PHOTO Main Office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Paramount Designs, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paramount Designs, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paramount Designs, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Paramount Designs, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 47 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Arizona.

Paramount Designs, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Paramount Designs, Inc.
Paramount Designs, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Paramount Designs, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 3 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 3 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · AZ · Phoenix

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BPG Designs 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arraycon LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&D Solutions, LLC - Alexandria 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robbins equipment 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Canyon Manufacturing "Factory 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Britannia Drive 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5725 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR QC Manufacturing 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette High School (001) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ancira Eagle Pass Automotive 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kmi International Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago CCA 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Growers Ag Labor LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Romeoville 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coastal Films of Florida 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.