Cancer detection program administration · Arizona

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290)

Phoenix, AZ · ~104 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cancer detection program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290): 12.8 TCR = 398% of Cancer detection program administration BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) safety composite

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290): 0.0 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 27.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290)'s TCR rose 14.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 14.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 27.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 398% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO CAN060-PHFE-CAN060
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CAN060-PHFE-CAN060 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) averages 12.8 TCR (398% of the Cancer detection program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=27.1 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=14 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) falls in its industry

267 Cancer detection program admin establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Cancer detection program admin employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) (104 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290)
Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) (104 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Maricopa County - Medical Examiner (290) has more employees than the Cancer detection program administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 6.5 7 8 0
2023 14.2 7.6 15 0 0
2022 16.5 4.1 12 4 0
2021 27.1 9.4 23 0 0
2020 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · AZ · Phoenix

267 Cancer detection program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CAN060-PHFE-CAN060 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEDICAL EXAMINER'S OFFICE 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Examiner's Office 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (53) 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 850180000 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01255 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5107 - AZ Pima County - PCADC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0017-0016-01221 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR TXH015 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FLO008 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1834 - Upland 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Craig Feed Mill 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital-MHN-IA 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patrick Industries/Business Unit 725 MMC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosaic Osceola, IN. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keller Technology Corporation - Huntersville 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.