Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County

Maytown, PA · ~72 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County: 8.5 TCR = 223% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County safety composite

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.1

2021→2024

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County injury rate improved

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County's TCR fell 21.1 from 22.9 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=22.9 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Maytown, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #136/233
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Manageme…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Management GTHI Seven Hills Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County averages 8.5 TCR (223% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County TCR series: 2021=22.9 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County (72 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County
Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County (72 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Paramount Senior Living at Lancaster County has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 4 0 0
2021 22.9 19.4 5 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Maytown

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Seven Hills Senior Living 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jurgens Park Senior Living 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Oaks 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fountain View of Coopersville 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Mount Joy 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Lawn Associates 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Middletown Egg 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ken Davis Mushroom Farms 72 FTE
NAT-TCR 5808 - New Jersey South 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrc 4120 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ABC Plumbing, Air, and Heat 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 5071 - NV Washoe County Detention 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Issc Inc DBA Seaport Steel 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAX Branch 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hatfield, MA - 95 N Hatfield Road 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanicville, NY--Route 67 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.