Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Parc at Sharon Amity

Charlotte, NC · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parc at Sharon Amity runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Parc at Sharon Amity: 8.6 TCR = 226% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parc at Sharon Amity safety composite

Parc at Sharon Amity scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.0

2016→2024

Parc at Sharon Amity injury rate improved

Parc at Sharon Amity's TCR fell 20.0 from 22.5 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.5 · 2017=17.1 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 226% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #254/356
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Redding
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Redding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Parc at Sharon Amity in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parc at Sharon Amity averages 8.6 TCR (226% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parc at Sharon Amity TCR series: 2016=22.5 · 2017=17.1 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=8 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Parc at Sharon Amity falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #254 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Parc at Sharon Amity (45 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Parc at Sharon Amity
Parc at Sharon Amity (45 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Parc at Sharon Amity has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 16.8 16.8 0 6 0
2019 8.0 0.0 3 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 1 0
2017 17.1 2.4 7 0 0
2016 22.5 7.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Charlotte

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Redding 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies McGregor 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Otay Ranch 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Seven Oaks 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Happy Holiday Christmas Trees 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cracon, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOMEZ HARVESTING 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewisville Operations Center 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Juniper Village at Lincoln Heights 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Womelsdorf - John F Martin & Sons 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Decktight Roofing Services, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grace Manor Care Center 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6800-DRC-AUBURN 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCAT Brownfield 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 12758 - Canton 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Hunks Hauling Junk 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.