General warehousing and storage · Georgia

Parker Service Center - Conyers

Conyers, GA · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parker Service Center - Conyers runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Parker Service Center - Conyers: 1.0 TCR = 17% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parker Service Center - Conyers safety composite

Parker Service Center - Conyers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2019

Parker Service Center - Conyers injury rate improved

Parker Service Center - Conyers's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Conyers, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #74/506
  • PHOTO Expeditors - SDF
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Expeditors - SDF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Parker Service Center - Conyers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parker Service Center - Conyers averages 1.0 TCR (17% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parker Service Center - Conyers TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Parker Service Center - Conyers falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 506 General warehousing and storag employers in Georgia.

Parker Service Center - Conyers (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Parker Service Center - Conyers
Parker Service Center - Conyers (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Parker Service Center - Conyers has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Conyers

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Conyers, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Expeditors - SDF 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlisle - 1495 Dennison Circle 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DRDC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OMNI IPW Warehouse 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands - Conyers Corporate 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands Lighting Conyers Complex 980 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCDLGATL 627 FTE
NAT-TCR Prolong Pharmaceuticals - 300CC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AWS-Schuylkill Valley 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Praxair 914 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6753 Coppell Millwork 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Global Products Inc. - Galley 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frattallone's Ace Hardware-Andover 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ritchie Engineering Company, Inc. Building 2 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE #105 Art Van Petoskey 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.