Recreational sports teams and leagues · North Carolina

Parks and Recreation

Morganton, NC · ~103 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parks and Recreation runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recreational sports teams and leagues workplace, earning a grade F.

Parks and Recreation: 9.9 TCR = 318% of Recreational sports teams and leagues BLS 3.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parks and Recreation safety composite

Parks and Recreation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parks and Recreation held a steady TCR band

Parks and Recreation's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.6 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=10.2 · 2022=11.0 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713990 · Morganton, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 318% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO LAGOON CORPORATION
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAGOON CORPORATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Parks and Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parks and Recreation averages 9.9 TCR (318% of the Recreational sports teams and leagues BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=10.2 · 2022=11 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.1

Where Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

289 Recreational sports teams and establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Recreational sports teams and employers in North Carolina.

Parks and Recreation (103 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation (103 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Parks and Recreation has more employees than the Recreational sports teams and leagues median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2023 7.3 2.4 3 0 0
2022 11.0 8.2 4 0 0
2020 10.2 6.8 3 0 0
2019 9.5 7.1 4 0 0
2018 16.9 14.5 7 0 0
2017 14.8 4.9 6 0 0
2016 4.6 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713990 · NC · Morganton

289 Recreational sports teams and leagues employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 106 employers in Morganton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAGOON CORPORATION 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adventure WV, LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Escape Game Gatlinburg LLC 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Golfland 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 103731 - Enviva Hamlet Plant 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Contracting 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Synergy Installation Solutions 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEX-BLUE RIDGE HOSPITAL 3,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Ridge HealthCare Hospitals, Inc. 1,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0090-BRHC Hospitals 1,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broughton Hospital 1,198 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockcastle Regional Hospital & Respiratory Care 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolfe Roofing 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Millwood Lumber Inc 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Machine 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0659 Glen Allen 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0608 Shrewsbury 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE 304A 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Hospital Company of Meridian, LLC 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.