Recreational programs administration, government · Oregon

Parks and Recreation

Name: Parks and Recreation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lake Oswego, OR · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parks and Recreation runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Recreational programs administration, government workplace, earning a grade C.

Parks and Recreation: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Recreational programs administration, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parks and Recreation safety composite

Parks and Recreation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parks and Recreation held a steady TCR band

Parks and Recreation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Lake Oswego, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/5
PHOTO City of Fremont - Co…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

City of Clive

0.1
Carroll Commun

0.1
Stevenson Comm

0.1
This site

0
City of Fremon

0

What this shows Parks and Recreation averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Recreational programs administration, government BLS benchmark).

Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

413 Recreational programs administ establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Recreational programs administ employers in Oregon.

Parks and Recreation (61 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Parks and Recreation has fewer employees than the Recreational programs administration, go median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · OR · Lake Oswego

413 Recreational programs administration, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 82 employers in Lake Oswego, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services	FREMONT, CA. 94537, CA	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Clive Aquatic Center	CLIVE, IA	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Carroll Community Center	OAK PARK, IL	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Stevenson Community Center	OAK PARK, IL	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Cherry Valley Orchard, Inc.	THE DALLES	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Spring Creek Gardens, Inc.	JUNCTION CITY	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lebanon	ALBANY	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Horizon Forestry, LLC	CENTRAL POINT	61 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mary's Woods at Marylhurst	Lake Oswego	336 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Eclipse Support Center	Lake Oswego	152 FTE
CITY-NEAR	The Springs at Lake Oswego	Lake Oswego	148 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1107 - NSM Mountain Park	Lake Oswego	140 FTE
NAT-TCR	GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care	North Olmsted, OH	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	TX-01	Austin, TX	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	NJ-05	Ewing Township, NJ	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	CT-02	Stamford, CT	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Food City Store #759	Chattanooga, TN	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wheatland Manor	Wheatland, IA	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Yorkville	Atlanta, GA	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	NuTec Tooling Systems, Inc.	Meadville, PA	61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.