Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard · New York

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc.

Binghamton, NY · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. safety composite

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. held a steady TCR band

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Binghamton, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO GBP FCD
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GBP FCD (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. falls in its industry

205 Cartons, folding (except milk) establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Cartons, folding (except milk) employers in New York.

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. (60 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc.
Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. (60 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Parlor City Paper Box Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Cartons, folding (except milk), made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · NY · Binghamton

205 Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 139 employers in Binghamton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GBP FCD 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MM Packaging 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOD-PAC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angleboard 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE East Coast Nurseries Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Mechanicville 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orchard Park SC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park7 Development, LLC 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Health Services Hospitals, Inc. 2,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-NYBIN1 1,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Tier Independence Center 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIRKWOOD PLANT 544 FTE
NAT-TCR Associated Pathologist, LLC dba Atlanta Dermatopathology 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : TUL - Tulsa 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sussex 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1052 Chandler 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Well Services, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAVFAC SW Environmental Services Contract 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waterford at Bridle Brook 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : TVC - Traverse City 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.