Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT)

Pasadena, TX · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT): 0.4 TCR = 18% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) safety composite

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2021

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) injury rate improved

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT)'s TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/292
  • PHOTO Comm HVAC NA and EME…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Ohio District : SVC-Columbus OH-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) averages 0.4 TCR (18% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 292 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Texas.

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT)
Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Pasadena Flowserve Seals QRC (DPT) has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · Pasadena

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Ohio District : SVC-Columbus OH-USA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Louisville 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Pacific Northwest Rocky Mountain : SVC-Seattle WA-USA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metso Outotec USA INC, Columbia 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Rice 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes Foods Inc / Hatchery 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-MIDLAND 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR CI - Ashville OH 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sprinturf, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AFB International LRC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Sciences : IDT - Coralville 2600 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dollar Tree (WC USX DPA) 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4261 ConAgra Knoxville 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Countrybrook Living Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cambridge South Healthcare Center 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.