Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas
Vision Park
Shenandoah, TX · ~72 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Vision Park runs at 439% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Vision Park's OSHA Total Case Rate of 16.7 to the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark of 3.8 (439% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Vision Park's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Where Vision Park falls in its industry
6,975 Assisted-living facilities wit establishmentsSafer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.
Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #469 safest of 496 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 8 injuries shown on this page for Vision Park are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623312 - Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
4 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 47,953 hours worked = 16.68 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Park (this establishment) | 16.68 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Homes for the elderly without nursing care industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 623312 |
| Texas state avg (all industries) | 3.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Vision Park to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2019: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 133.3 | 133.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Vision Park's reported OSHA injury record versus its Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 439% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities benchmark, Vision Park reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Vision Park's safety grade?
How many injuries has Vision Park reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Texas, and by nearby establishments in Shenandoah - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~16.7)
Similar size (~72 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.