Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · California

PathPoint Lancaster

Lancaster, CA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PathPoint Lancaster runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade F.

PathPoint Lancaster: 7.6 TCR = 201% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PathPoint Lancaster safety composite

PathPoint Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PathPoint Lancaster: 0.0 → 19.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 19.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.51× in 2024

PathPoint Lancaster's TCR rose 19.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 19.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 19.2 DART
  • RANK #99/141
  • PHOTO West Burnside Store
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Burnside Store (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PathPoint Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PathPoint Lancaster averages 7.6 TCR (201% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PathPoint Lancaster TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=19.2 · BLS 3.8

Where PathPoint Lancaster falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 141 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in California.

PathPoint Lancaster (20 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate PathPoint Lancaster
PathPoint Lancaster (20 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

PathPoint Lancaster has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.2 19.2 3 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2022 7.5 7.5 1 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Lancaster

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Burnside Store 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bureau of the Census 1790 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 214 - Plainfield 4 Mile Store 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Industries of Greater NE - Hastings Services 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR Bellevue 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo Wire Works 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateway Springs 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0375 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercer Trucking Co., Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wind River Environmental Hiram, GA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Esperanza 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at United Club Rdu Per Pax 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.