Skilled nursing facilities · Maryland

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center

Laurel, MD · ~128 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center: 5.3 TCR = 81% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center: 4.5 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2020

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 1.8 from 4.5 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Laurel, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 81% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #61/176
  • PHOTO Willow Brook Christi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willow Brook Christian Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 5.3 TCR (81% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=6.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 176 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Maryland.

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center (128 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center
Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center (128 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Patuxent River Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.3 6.3 0 6 0
2019 7.1 5.0 7 0 0
2018 2.9 0.9 3 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 6 0 0
2016 4.5 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MD · Laurel

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 125 employers in Laurel, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willow Brook Christian Village 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Center Convalescent Hospital 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Mentor Operating Company LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead Village, Inc. 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MPS 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE John E Kelly and Sons 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE US735: Linthicum Heights (Baltimore) 565 - SG 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.M. Thornton Mechanical 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR BURTONSVILLE (MDBUR) 2,341 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDBUR - BURTONSVILLE 2,339 FTE
CITY-NEAR WSSC Water 1,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beltsville (Laurel) 1,661 FTE
NAT-TCR Nw Houston, Tx 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Upper Peninsula Telephone Company 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1158 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Contact Cartage Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FI - Cape Coral, LLC 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2532-Kearney, NE 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Building Products CBPQ 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : PNS - Pensacola 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.