Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · New Jersey

Patwin Plastics, Inc

Linden, NJ · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Patwin Plastics, Inc runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Patwin Plastics, Inc: 6.5 TCR = 195% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Patwin Plastics, Inc safety composite

Patwin Plastics, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Patwin Plastics, Inc: 3.0 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Patwin Plastics, Inc's TCR rose 3.9 from 3.0 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Linden, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/44
  • PHOTO Crescent Industries,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crescent Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Patwin Plastics, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Patwin Plastics, Inc averages 6.5 TCR (195% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Patwin Plastics, Inc TCR series: 2017=3 · 2021=9.5 · 2023=6.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Patwin Plastics, Inc falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 44 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in New Jersey.

Patwin Plastics, Inc (36 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Patwin Plastics, Inc
Patwin Plastics, Inc (36 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Patwin Plastics, Inc has fewer employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 9.5 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NJ · Linden

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 108 employers in Linden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crescent Industries, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topp Industries, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Speed North America 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockford Molded Products, Inc. 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Atlantic City Sewerage Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE B. Tait Builders, L.L.C. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Apron Linden FC 879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips66 Bayway Refinery 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Staffing Solutions 766 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayway Refinery 693 FTE
NAT-TCR WESTPAC LABS Central 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Gorman Group LLC 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AgMart Produce SFL 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Topp Industries, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarendon Hills Fire Department 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harodite Industries, Inc. North 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wenger Group - Rheems Operations Center 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.