Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers · Utah

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas

Salt Lake City, UT · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas: 0.5 TCR = 23% of Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas safety composite

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2023

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas injury rate improved

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423450 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO 169 - SACRAMENTO FAS
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 169 - SACRAMENTO FAS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas averages 0.5 TCR (23% of the Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where 199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas falls in its industry

754 Professional and commercial eq establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Professional and commercial eq employers in Utah.

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas (36 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas
199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas (36 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0

199 - Utah (Salt Lake) Fas has fewer employees than the Professional and commercial equipment an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423450 · UT · Salt Lake City

754 Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 169 - SACRAMENTO FAS 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 487 - DALLAS FAS 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker- Mobius 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corpus Christi,TX 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00559 RICHFIELD SERVICE CTR 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big-D Midwest 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Star General Contractors, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE SME Steel Arizona Field 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Essendant: Bakersfield OE FE IE 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Valassis Belleville 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Duro-Last Roofing (MS) 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue and Gold Fleet - Pier 41 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clarendon Hills Fire Department 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harodite Industries, Inc. North 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wenger Group - Rheems Operations Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patwin Plastics, Inc 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.