Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufacturing · New Jersey

Paulaur Corporation

Cranbury, NJ · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
4.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paulaur Corporation runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Paulaur Corporation: 5.5 TCR = 132% of Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufacturing BLS 4.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paulaur Corporation safety composite

Paulaur Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Paulaur Corporation injury rate improved

Paulaur Corporation's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311340 · Cranbury, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 132% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Spangler Candy Compa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spangler Candy Company- West Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Paulaur Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paulaur Corporation averages 5.5 TCR (132% of the Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paulaur Corporation TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.2

Where Paulaur Corporation falls in its industry

123 Cake ornaments, confectionery, establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Cake ornaments, confectionery, employers in New Jersey.

Paulaur Corporation (85 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 169 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Paulaur Corporation
Paulaur Corporation (85 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 169 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Paulaur Corporation has fewer employees than the Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2020 6.7 5.5 6 0 0
2019 10.1 4.0 7 3 0
2018 7.5 3.2 7 0 0
2017 9.8 3.9 8 2 0
2016 6.0 2.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311340 · NJ · Cranbury

123 Cake ornaments, confectionery, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 86 employers in Cranbury, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spangler Candy Company- West Campus 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR YouBar Inc 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charms 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tootsie Roll Industries, LLC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE KF Mechanical LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.A. Productions, LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wayne NJ (Riverview Dr) Depot 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millwood Inc. - South River 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : TEB6 1,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TTN2 503 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ_Cranbury_18 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cranbury 1 454 FTE
NAT-TCR BelArt Company LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Youngblood Excavating & Contracting Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-West Spring & Stamping 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benton Charter Township 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royersford 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quapaw 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.