Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Paul's Run Retirement Community

Philadelphia, PA · ~357 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paul's Run Retirement Community runs at 390% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Paul's Run Retirement Community: 14.8 TCR = 390% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paul's Run Retirement Community safety composite

Paul's Run Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Paul's Run Retirement Community: 5.4 → 19.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 36.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2021

Paul's Run Retirement Community's TCR rose 14.2 from 5.4 in 2016 to 19.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 390% of ind

  • DART 18.5 DART
  • RANK #225/257
  • PHOTO Smith Cares
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smith Cares (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Paul's Run Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paul's Run Retirement Community averages 14.8 TCR (390% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paul's Run Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=8.3 · 2020=36.5 · 2021=19.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Paul's Run Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Paul's Run Retirement Community (357 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Paul's Run Retirement Community
Paul's Run Retirement Community (357 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Paul's Run Retirement Community has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 19.7 18.5 16 34 0
2020 36.5 35.3 10 84 0
2018 8.3 4.0 13 10 0
2017 4.1 3.4 10 1 0
2016 5.4 3.9 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Philadelphia

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smith Cares 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge House of Maryvi 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Thousand Oaks - 476 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PVV 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winland Foods Inc 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airo Division 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1644 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1823 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Knights Precast, Inc 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Deep Gap Wildcat Road 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dsc3 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TENNESSEE 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joliet Police Department 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tidal Logistics, Inc. 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warren 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics OTS Garland 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.