Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing · Texas

General Dynamics OTS Garland

Garland, TX · ~357 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Dynamics OTS Garland runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

General Dynamics OTS Garland: 2.7 TCR = 83% of Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Dynamics OTS Garland safety composite

General Dynamics OTS Garland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Dynamics OTS Garland: 1.6 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.03× in 2021

General Dynamics OTS Garland's TCR rose 4.3 from 1.6 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332993 · Garland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Nammo Pocal Inc. Mos…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nammo Pocal Inc. Moscow (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

General Dynamics OTS Garland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Dynamics OTS Garland averages 2.7 TCR (83% of the Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Dynamics OTS Garland TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where General Dynamics OTS Garland falls in its industry

36 Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 employers in Texas.

General Dynamics OTS Garland (357 employees, TCR 2.7) among 26 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 188 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 27 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Dynamics OTS Garland
General Dynamics OTS Garland (357 employees, TCR 2.7) among 26 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 188 employees and a TCR of 1.7

General Dynamics OTS Garland has more employees than the Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.8 5.5 7 12 0
2020 2.9 2.4 7 4 0
2019 2.1 1.2 9 0 0
2018 1.8 1.4 8 0 0
2017 2.1 1.9 9 0 0
2016 1.6 0.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332993 · TX · Garland

36 Ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nammo Pocal Inc. Moscow 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nammo Defense Systems 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Combined Systems Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Dynamics - OTS Garland TX 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mont Belvieu Complex 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duphil Corporate Office 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tidal Logistics, Inc. 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE A-Core of Texas 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR Searsport Terminal 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph's Hospital EVS 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake City Office 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CLS - Winston-Salem 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health Jay, Inc. 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gibson 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joliet Police Department 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.