Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Paulus Engineering, Inc.

Anaheim, CA · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paulus Engineering, Inc. runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Paulus Engineering, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 45% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paulus Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Paulus Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Paulus Engineering, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Paulus Engineering, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Anaheim, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #32/201
  • PHOTO Advantage Dirt Contr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advantage Dirt Contractors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Paulus Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paulus Engineering, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (45% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paulus Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Paulus Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Paulus Engineering, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Paulus Engineering, Inc.
Paulus Engineering, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Paulus Engineering, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Anaheim

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advantage Dirt Contractors Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR US FUSION and Specialty Construction 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skanska-Ecco III-HPA JV 90007820 Hunts Point 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peerless-Midwest, Inc. Mishawaka Location 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR 102 Baton Rouge 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tube Specialties, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastline Equipment 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Gypsum 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monroe La 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Creek Contracting LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nutrisol LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&F Machining Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.