Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Louisiana

US FUSION and Specialty Construction

Baton Rouge, LA · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US FUSION and Specialty Construction runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

US FUSION and Specialty Construction: 1.3 TCR = 45% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US FUSION and Specialty Construction safety composite

US FUSION and Specialty Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2018→2024

US FUSION and Specialty Construction injury rate improved

US FUSION and Specialty Construction's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.5 in 2018 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO Advantage Dirt Contr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advantage Dirt Contractors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

US FUSION and Specialty Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US FUSION and Specialty Construction averages 1.3 TCR (45% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US FUSION and Specialty Construction TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where US FUSION and Specialty Construction falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Louisiana.

US FUSION and Specialty Construction (80 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate US FUSION and Specialty Construction
US FUSION and Specialty Construction (80 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

US FUSION and Specialty Construction has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · LA · Baton Rouge

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advantage Dirt Contractors Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paulus Engineering, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skanska-Ecco III-HPA JV 90007820 Hunts Point 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peerless-Midwest, Inc. Mishawaka Location 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Plant 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE McInnis Brothers Construction Inc 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Parish Contractors, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Westlake Vinyls Company Geismar LA 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR American Gypsum 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tube Specialties, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paulus Engineering, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Engineered Fastening 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Site Rite Construction Co 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Combe Laboratories 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant Kinetics 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 235 Elizabeth 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.