Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway · Ohio

Pavement Technology, Inc

Westlake, OH · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pavement Technology, Inc runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway workplace, earning a grade D.

Pavement Technology, Inc: 5.2 TCR = 184% of Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pavement Technology, Inc safety composite

Pavement Technology, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2019

Pavement Technology, Inc injury rate improved

Pavement Technology, Inc's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Westlake, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/64
  • PHOTO Associated Scaffoldi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Associated Scaffolding Company Incorporated Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Pavement Technology, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pavement Technology, Inc averages 5.2 TCR (184% of the Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pavement Technology, Inc TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pavement Technology, Inc falls in its industry

1,634 Asphalt coating and sealing, r establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 64 Asphalt coating and sealing, r employers in Ohio.

Pavement Technology, Inc (29 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pavement Technology, Inc
Pavement Technology, Inc (29 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Pavement Technology, Inc has fewer employees than the Asphalt coating and sealing, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.8 6.6 3 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.0 3.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · OH · Westlake

1,634 Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 95 employers in Westlake, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Associated Scaffolding Company Incorporated Greensboro 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fenceworks Rental Systems Inc 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ronnie C. Folk Paving, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swim Things, Inc. 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Union City Facility 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breeder Division Field Office 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plibrico Refractories LLC - Oak Hill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanging Rock Energy Facility 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John Medical Center 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Erie Electric, Inc. 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equity Administrative Services, Inc. - Westlake Office 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR TruWest Company 307 FTE
NAT-TCR TransPak- San Jose 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 3245 N. Campbell Ave. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PBi 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR House of Power Electric, LC 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries of El Paso Inc. / Warehouse / Transportation 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deche Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE iFLY Rosemont 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE iFLY Austin 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.