Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Ohio

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated

Celina, OH · ~189 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated: 4.3 TCR = 81% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated safety composite

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated: 3.1 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.1 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Celina, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #47/94
  • PHOTO Toyotetsu Mid Americ…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toyotetsu Mid America, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pax Machine Works, Incorporated averages 4.3 TCR (81% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Pax Machine Works, Incorporated falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 94 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Ohio.

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated (189 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Pax Machine Works, Incorporated
Pax Machine Works, Incorporated (189 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pax Machine Works, Incorporated has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.1 6 1 0
2023 2.5 0.5 5 0 0
2022 4.2 0.5 6 2 0
2021 2.5 0.0 3 2 0
2020 8.1 1.1 8 7 0
2019 3.6 0.9 8 0 0
2018 4.6 0.4 9 2 0
2017 6.8 0.8 14 2 0
2016 3.1 0.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · OH · Celina

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 39 employers in Celina, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toyotetsu Mid America, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR E&E Manufacturing 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Variety Die & Stamping Co. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Engraving Corporation - West Salem 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kokosing Alberici Traylor, LLC 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Production 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Mulch Supply 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creative Foam - Dayton 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crown Equipment Corporation Celina 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crown Equipment Corporation CE 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAPT 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Celina Aluminum Precision Technology Inc. 463 FTE
NAT-TCR To-Jo Food Products Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3061 Keystone 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VDF Drum Dry Plant 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edinburgh DVA 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merrick Engineering, Inc 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1880 Lkq 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. Headquarters 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.