Denatured alcohol manufacturing · Nebraska

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings

Hastings, NE · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Denatured alcohol manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings: 4.3 TCR = 132% of Denatured alcohol manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings safety composite

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings held a steady TCR band

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.2 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325193 · Hastings, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 132% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #12/24
  • PHOTO Iroquois Bio-Energy
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iroquois Bio-Energy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings averages 4.3 TCR (132% of the Denatured alcohol manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=4 · 2020=4 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=6 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings falls in its industry

228 Denatured alcohol manufacturin establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 24 Denatured alcohol manufacturin employers in Nebraska.

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings (66 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings
Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings (66 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings has more employees than the Denatured alcohol manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2023 6.0 3.0 4 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2020 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2019 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2018 9.3 6.7 7 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.2 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325193 · NE · Hastings

228 Denatured alcohol manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 65 employers in Hastings, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iroquois Bio-Energy 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Plains Fairmont LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heron Lake BioEnergy LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Bend Ethanol, LLC 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Google UNO Building 2 22120008 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ex2 Technology LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omaha Steaks Snyder 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Wood River LLC 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital 1,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR WR Reserve 381 FTE
NAT-TCR VDF Drum Dry Plant 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McKee Foods Corporation and Affiliates, Gentry Arkansas 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR To-Jo Food Products Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pax Machine Works, Incorporated 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Romulus Division 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poultry Service Associates Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at Charlottesville 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Recycling Jacksonville 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.