Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Connecticut

PCX Aerostructures Newington

Newington, CT · ~174 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PCX Aerostructures Newington runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

PCX Aerostructures Newington: 7.8 TCR = 236% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PCX Aerostructures Newington safety composite

PCX Aerostructures Newington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2019→2020

PCX Aerostructures Newington injury rate improved

PCX Aerostructures Newington's TCR fell 0.9 from 8.2 in 2019 to 7.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.2 · 2020=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Newington, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 236% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #32/36
  • PHOTO Farwest Aircraft, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Farwest Aircraft, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

PCX Aerostructures Newington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PCX Aerostructures Newington averages 7.8 TCR (236% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PCX Aerostructures Newington TCR series: 2019=8.2 · 2020=7.4 · BLS 3.3

Where PCX Aerostructures Newington falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 36 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Connecticut.

PCX Aerostructures Newington (174 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate PCX Aerostructures Newington
PCX Aerostructures Newington (174 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

PCX Aerostructures Newington has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.4 5.1 11 2 0
2019 8.2 5.9 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CT · Newington

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 85 employers in Newington, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Farwest Aircraft, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Clarksburg (1508) 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lamsco 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acutec Precision Aerospace, Inc. Meadville 2 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mannkind Corporation 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wittmann USA Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2544 LOWE S OF DANBURY CT 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100644 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Companions Forever LLC 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Wholesale Grocers : Newington, CT (DC) 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stew Leonard's - Newington 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2965 218 FTE
NAT-TCR Catalina Offshore Products 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reeve Cattle Company 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HG201 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bayfront Health Port Charlotte 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rubbermaid Distribution Center 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmond Ia 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri City Extrusion Plant 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE DDS - Florida 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.