Skilled nursing facilities · Missouri

Peace Haven Association

St. Louis, MO · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peace Haven Association runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Peace Haven Association: 1.2 TCR = 19% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peace Haven Association safety composite

Peace Haven Association scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2023

Peace Haven Association injury rate improved

Peace Haven Association's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 19% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #31/457
  • PHOTO Broadway Rehabilitat…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Broadway Rehabilitation and Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Peace Haven Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peace Haven Association averages 1.2 TCR (19% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peace Haven Association TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Peace Haven Association falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 457 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Missouri.

Peace Haven Association (63 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Peace Haven Association
Peace Haven Association (63 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Peace Haven Association has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MO · St. Louis

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Broadway Rehabilitation and Care Center 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Place Nursing and Rehab 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR McComb Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Balch Springs Nursing Home 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rembrandt Foods Neosho Operation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10301 North Service Road 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-America Contractors, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kozeny-Wagner, Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Metal Recycling Toys Scrap Eau Claire 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cortland Preschool 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cactus Drilling Rig 142 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OH - Alta / Pokemon 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coaster-NJ 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lexington Assisted Living Center 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE EXCEL Fabrication 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 100730 Omaha Distribution Center 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.