Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing · Arkansas

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill

Corning, AR · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill safety composite

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill: 2.7 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.7 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Corning, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO LEOTI FM & DELIVERY
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEOTI FM & DELIVERY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.9

Where Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill falls in its industry

756 Chicken feeds, prepared, manuf establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Chicken feeds, prepared, manuf employers in Arkansas.

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill (44 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill
Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill (44 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill has more employees than the Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2016 2.7 2.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · AR · Corning

756 Chicken feeds, prepared, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 5 employers in Corning, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEOTI FM & DELIVERY 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cochecton Mills Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millsboro Feed Mill 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition - New Richland 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Childress Gin and Elevator Company 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Stone Construction, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ECC:EC254 - EC254-Van Buren, AR-0300 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE OKF Newlon Warehouse 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 235 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNNC, Inc. dba Corning Therapy and Living Center 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riceland Foods - Corning Drier Facility 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDWARD L BAKER ENTERPRISES INC CORNING FACILITY 17 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia Memorial Health 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomah Main Bldg 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Courtyard By Marriott 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Pneumatic Tools 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sika Canton 225 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fastrak Express,Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.