Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Wisconsin

Tomah Main Bldg

Tomah, WI · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tomah Main Bldg runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade B.

Tomah Main Bldg: 2.6 TCR = 70% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tomah Main Bldg safety composite

Tomah Main Bldg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Tomah Main Bldg injury rate improved

Tomah Main Bldg's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Tomah, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/60
  • PHOTO South Sacramento MLS
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Sacramento MLS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Tomah Main Bldg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tomah Main Bldg averages 2.6 TCR (70% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tomah Main Bldg TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Tomah Main Bldg falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 60 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Wisconsin.

Tomah Main Bldg (46 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tomah Main Bldg
Tomah Main Bldg (46 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Tomah Main Bldg has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2020 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · WI · Tomah

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 61 employers in Tomah, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Sacramento MLS 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7000-12425 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ViaQuest Foundation - Dayton 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RWS TX DALLAS MESQUITE 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services - Wisconsin 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baraboo Operations 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schuh General Construction 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holtz Builders, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6085 819 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6085 791 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toro Company - Tomah Manufacturing Plant 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tomah IG 513 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire Department 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Peco Foods Inc.-Feedmill 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Memorial Health 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hundley Farms Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Oshkosh Plant 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northeast Missouri Grain LLC d/b/a POET biorefining- Macon 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land of Lincoln Goodwill Dirksen Store 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.