Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing · New York

Peerless Instrument

E. Farmingdale, NY · ~105 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peerless Instrument runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Peerless Instrument: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peerless Instrument safety composite

Peerless Instrument scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2021

Peerless Instrument injury rate improved

Peerless Instrument's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · E. Farmingdale, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO PI - Hopkinton
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PI - Hopkinton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Peerless Instrument in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peerless Instrument averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peerless Instrument TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Peerless Instrument falls in its industry

128 Nuclear instrument modules man establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Nuclear instrument modules man employers in New York.

Peerless Instrument (105 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Peerless Instrument
Peerless Instrument (105 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Peerless Instrument has more employees than the Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 3.0 1.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · NY · E. Farmingdale

128 Nuclear instrument modules manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 5 employers in E. Farmingdale, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PI - Hopkinton 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gleason Metrology Systems 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Control Devices Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interface 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Artimus LLC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sea Beach 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Park Conveyance 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE FJM-Ferro, Inc. 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR L.K. Comstock & Company, Inc. 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR RailWorks Transit, Inc. 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Farmingdale 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR LKC Farmingdale 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Ethicon, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookfield Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Directional Crossings- Brownsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matalco (US) Inc. Lordstown 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson Sheetmetal 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Line Rd. 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.