Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Virginia

Pender Logistics

Fairfax, VA · ~65 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pender Logistics runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Pender Logistics: 2.8 TCR = 42% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pender Logistics safety composite

Pender Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.0

2020→2024

Pender Logistics injury rate improved

Pender Logistics's TCR fell 11.0 from 11.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=11.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Fairfax, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.8 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/165
  • PHOTO Sogo Logistics SD LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sogo Logistics SD LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Pender Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pender Logistics averages 2.8 TCR (42% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pender Logistics TCR series: 2020=11 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Pender Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 165 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Virginia.

Pender Logistics (65 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Pender Logistics
Pender Logistics (65 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Pender Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.0 11.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · VA · Fairfax

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 226 employers in Fairfax, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sogo Logistics SD LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DDO6 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 630 DOWD AVENUE 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercury in Motion, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE POSSUM PT PW ST 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLUE RIDGE 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works-Wastewater 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Richmond 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Health System 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Physician Group 2,539 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Fair Oaks Hospital 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Virginia Community College - Annandale 870 FTE
NAT-TCR St Cloud Auto Center, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR New Mexico 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FDR Services Corp of New York 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 42 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Centrifugal Castings, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peoria Charter Coach Company Peoria Facility 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASAP Installations LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black River Imaging 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.