Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc.

Kersey, PA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc.: 8.3 TCR = 153% of Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. safety composite

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2016→2023

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. injury rate improved

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.2 from 18.2 in 2016 to 12.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.2 · 2017=17.0 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=12.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Kersey, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO ZF Chassis Systems-C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ZF Chassis Systems-Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. averages 8.3 TCR (153% of the Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. TCR series: 2016=18.2 · 2017=17 · 2018=7 · 2019=3 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=6 · 2023=12 · BLS 5.4

Where Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. falls in its industry

320 Transmissions and parts, autom establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Transmissions and parts, autom employers in Pennsylvania.

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Penn Metal Stamping, Inc.
Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Penn Metal Stamping, Inc. has fewer employees than the Transmissions and parts, automotive, tru median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 7.0 0.0 3 0 0
2017 17.0 6.4 8 0 0
2016 18.2 5.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · PA · Kersey

320 Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Kersey, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ZF Chassis Systems-Chicago 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 8 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacLean Fogg Component Solutions Saegertown 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 25 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN St. Marys 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Sinter Metals - Fairview 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR REBCO, Inc 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Disposal - Greentree Landfill 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City 154 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bay Stucco, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversified Coatings 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Madera Rehab & Nursing Center 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gen-El-Mec Associates, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Tide Defense Systems 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE VanderSloot Farms 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.