Distribution of electric power · Maryland

PEPCO- Control Center

Bethesda, MD · ~89 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PEPCO- Control Center runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

PEPCO- Control Center: 1.0 TCR = 83% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PEPCO- Control Center safety composite

PEPCO- Control Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PEPCO- Control Center held a steady TCR band

PEPCO- Control Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO West DOC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West DOC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

PEPCO- Control Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PEPCO- Control Center averages 1.0 TCR (83% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PEPCO- Control Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where PEPCO- Control Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Distribution of electric power employers in Maryland.

PEPCO- Control Center (89 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PEPCO- Control Center
PEPCO- Control Center (89 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

PEPCO- Control Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 1 0
2021 6.8 6.8 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MD · Bethesda

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West DOC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACE- West Creek Operations 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEPCO- Kenilworth 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSC - Wake Forest 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes DC Metro 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harvey-Cleary Builders - Maryland 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comer Construction, Inc. 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Systems, LLC 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR PEPCO- Kenilworth 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #25 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BRAWCO, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Felt & Filter Company, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 630 - Dump - Dallas 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpha RPC - D002 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE HQC Inc. ACP Properties LLC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transport Service 60005 Midland 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.