Poultry Processing · North Carolina

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing

St. Pauls, NC · ~1,145 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry Processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing: 7.6 TCR = 231% of Poultry Processing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing safety composite

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.3

2016→2024

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing injury rate improved

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing's TCR fell 15.3 from 19.2 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.2 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · St. Pauls, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 231% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #26/32
  • PHOTO Corydon Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 313 inj
  • SIZE ~1,145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corydon Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing averages 7.6 TCR (231% of the Poultry Processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing TCR series: 2016=19.2 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry Processing establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 32 Poultry Processing employers in North Carolina.

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing (1,145 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing
Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing (1,145 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing has more employees than the Poultry Processing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 2.8 39 6 0
2023 2.4 2.2 24 3 0
2022 6.9 6.9 48 28 0
2021 6.7 6.7 40 30 0
2020 4.8 4.4 23 31 0
2019 5.1 4.8 24 31 0
2018 9.7 9.2 40 62 0
2017 9.7 8.6 66 30 0
2016 19.2 19.2 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · NC · St. Pauls

509 Poultry Processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 9 employers in St. Pauls, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corydon Plant 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dardanelle Plant 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SQUAB PRODUCERS OF CALIFORNIA 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Live Haul 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowan County Government 1,151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherry Hospital 1,136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT9 1,155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prestage Foods 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR PBV-St. Pauls 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watts Water Technologies 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watts Regulator Co. (Mueller Steam Specialty) 169 FTE
NAT-TCR Buffalo Lumber Tie 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #113 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tiff's Treats - D8 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Scioto Ready Mix 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norwood Medical 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temperanceville Plant 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mclaren Oakland 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perez Farming Services Inc. 1,145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.