Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Idaho

Perimeter Security Group LLC

Coeur D'Alene, ID · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Perimeter Security Group LLC runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade D.

Perimeter Security Group LLC: 4.0 TCR = 142% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Perimeter Security Group LLC safety composite

Perimeter Security Group LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2018→2022

Perimeter Security Group LLC injury rate improved

Perimeter Security Group LLC's TCR fell 9.0 from 9.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Coeur D'Alene, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 142% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Johnson and Sons Pav…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson and Sons Paving LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Perimeter Security Group LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Perimeter Security Group LLC averages 4.0 TCR (142% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Perimeter Security Group LLC TCR series: 2018=9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Perimeter Security Group LLC falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Fence installation (except ele employers in Idaho.

Perimeter Security Group LLC (69 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Perimeter Security Group LLC
Perimeter Security Group LLC (69 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Perimeter Security Group LLC has more employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.3 3.1 7 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.0 6.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · ID · Coeur D'Alene

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 44 employers in Coeur D'Alene, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson and Sons Paving LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loxley 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAM LLC dba Mid America Specialty Services 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heiberger Paving, Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edwards Smith Construction 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleanup and Total Restoration 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idahoan Foods, LLC - Rupert Plant 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE PedSafety, a Dick Campbell Company 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0773 - COEUR D'ALENE ID WHSE 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0679 - Coeur d'Alene 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Idaho Distributing 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifecare Center of Coeur D'Alene 144 FTE
NAT-TCR The Leonardo 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1400 - Hanford 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1161 - Brighton-OH 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 48 - La Crosse 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orion Engineered Carbons, LLC Borger Plant 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burfords Tree LLC - 347 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aragon Construction, Inc. 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.