Water supply systems · Oregon

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus

Bend, OR · ~69 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus runs at 818% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water supply systems workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus: 9.8 TCR = 818% of Water supply systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus safety composite

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus: 7.8 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 20.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2022

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus's TCR rose 3.0 from 7.8 in 2016 to 10.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Bend, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 818% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #15/18
  • PHOTO Water & Sewer - Spri…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Water & Sewer - Spring Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus averages 9.8 TCR (818% of the Water supply systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=20.4 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=11 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=10.9 · BLS 1.2

Where City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus falls in its industry

727 Water supply systems establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 18 Water supply systems employers in Oregon.

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus (69 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus
City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus (69 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus has more employees than the Water supply systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.9 9.5 3 5 0
2021 4.3 4.3 2 1 0
2020 5.5 3.2 6 1 0
2019 11.0 5.5 6 2 0
2018 8.7 6.3 7 0 0
2017 20.4 5.8 4 3 0
2016 7.8 1.6 1 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · OR · Bend

727 Water supply systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 254 employers in Bend, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Water & Sewer - Spring Street 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RMWD 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York American Water - Merrick 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of South San Francisco - Water Quality Control Plant 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 601 Suburban Door Tualatin 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATI Cast Products Salem Operations 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cummins Battery Systems North America LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE GTS - Portland 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Bend 3,592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Bachelor 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Redmond 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Bend Inc, 438 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0005-0004-00801 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-04060 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-00606 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02359 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burfords Tree LLC - 347 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearly Clean Products, LLC. (1) 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orion Engineered Carbons, LLC Borger Plant 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perimeter Security Group LLC 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.