Roofing contractors · California

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing

Hayward, CA · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing safety composite

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2019

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing injury rate improved

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Hayward, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/149
  • PHOTO FW Walton Houston
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FW Walton Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 149 Roofing contractors employers in California.

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing (59 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing
PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing (59 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Hayward, CA/ Re-Roofing has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · CA · Hayward

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FW Walton Houston 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PIEDMONT COMMERCIAL ROOFING, INC. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Protech Roofing Systems LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peterson Roofing Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Fundamental Labor Strategies Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Norcross GA - Adult/Pediatric Specialists 90-34-39-21 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WCFS Redstone 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Turner at UOP a Honeywell Company Shreveport LA 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sure Shot Drilling 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freightliner of Savannah, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville Temtco LMS 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepsi Cola of Florence, LLC. dba Pee Dee Food Service 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.