Gasoline pump, service station, installation · Oklahoma

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC

Tulsa, OK · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Gasoline pump, service station, installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC: 2.7 TCR = 97% of Gasoline pump, service station, installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC safety composite

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2020

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC injury rate improved

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC's TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Airways Door Service
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Airways Door Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC averages 2.7 TCR (97% of the Gasoline pump, service station, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC falls in its industry

1,138 Gasoline pump, service station establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Gasoline pump, service station employers in Oklahoma.

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC (23 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC
Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC (23 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Petroleum Marketers Eq Co of Tulsa LLC has fewer employees than the Gasoline pump, service station, installa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.2 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · OK · Tulsa

1,138 Gasoline pump, service station, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Airways Door Service 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Omaha 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lenoir Site 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE PLUM THICKETT MULT SOW -EST 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP OKLAHOMA MAINT 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP OKLAHOMA GROUND MAINT 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broken Bow Hatchery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Hrc 118 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooks Brothers Cabinetry, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Braeburn Elementary 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherco Generating Plant 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colonial Heights (#17) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 123 Springs Plaza 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Improvements 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flohr Machine Company, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.