Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Florida

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors

Jacksonville, FL · ~192 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors safety composite

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2020→2022

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors injury rate improved

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.2 in 2020 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #36/121
  • PHOTO Gateway Pacific Cont…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors TCR series: 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 121 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Florida.

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors (192 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors
Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors (192 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 0.9 4 0 0
2021 2.1 0.4 5 0 0
2020 2.2 1.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · FL · Jacksonville

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pact Two, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caddick Utilities LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.J. Louis Construction, INC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Endo-Therapeutics, Inc. 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8444 FT MYERS EAST 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1506 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Fellowes, Inc Itasca 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MEC, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bshsi St. Fran East 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Peoria 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CNC Software, Inc. 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1359-Duke Midwest Region 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kings County Medical Group 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.