Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Ohio

P&G Test Stand Development Center

Cincinnati, OH · ~118 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P&G Test Stand Development Center runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

P&G Test Stand Development Center: 0.4 TCR = 86% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P&G Test Stand Development Center safety composite

P&G Test Stand Development Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2017

P&G Test Stand Development Center injury rate improved

P&G Test Stand Development Center's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/24
  • PHOTO PESYSTEMS-OH
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PESYSTEMS-OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

P&G Test Stand Development Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P&G Test Stand Development Center averages 0.4 TCR (86% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P&G Test Stand Development Center TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0 · BLS 0.5

Where P&G Test Stand Development Center falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Engineering research and devel employers in Ohio.

P&G Test Stand Development Center (118 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate P&G Test Stand Development Center
P&G Test Stand Development Center (118 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

P&G Test Stand Development Center has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · OH · Cincinnati

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PESYSTEMS-OH 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Development Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kodak Research Labs 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scripps Campus 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contracting Solutions, LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Services, Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Ice Cream Co - Utica 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFO Ice Cream 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Grid Solutions : CS NAM - Field Services (DE) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Automation and Controls : Charlottesville, VA 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich - AMI Industries Interiors 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Firestone Polymers Lake Charles Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of St Charles LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Springfield East LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trig's Everest Metro 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jessicas Brick Oven 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.