Housing, single-family, construction general contractors · Minnesota

Phase One Enterprises, Inc

St Paul, MN · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phase One Enterprises, Inc runs at 463% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Housing, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Phase One Enterprises, Inc: 17.6 TCR = 463% of Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phase One Enterprises, Inc safety composite

Phase One Enterprises, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2024

Phase One Enterprises, Inc injury rate improved

Phase One Enterprises, Inc's TCR fell 9.1 from 25.0 in 2017 to 15.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 50.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.0 · 2018=50.6 · 2019=27.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2022=13.0 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=15.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · St Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 463% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO Spring Creek Constru…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Creek Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Phase One Enterprises, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phase One Enterprises, Inc averages 17.6 TCR (463% of the Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phase One Enterprises, Inc TCR series: 2017=25 · 2018=50.6 · 2019=27.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2022=13 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Phase One Enterprises, Inc falls in its industry

976 Housing, single-family, constr establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Housing, single-family, constr employers in Minnesota.

Phase One Enterprises, Inc (41 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Phase One Enterprises, Inc
Phase One Enterprises, Inc (41 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Phase One Enterprises, Inc has fewer employees than the Housing, single-family, construction gen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 0.0 5 0 0
2023 15.9 15.9 5 0 0
2022 13.0 0.0 5 0 0
2020 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2019 27.2 2.5 11 0 0
2018 50.6 5.6 17 1 0
2017 25.0 0.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MN · St Paul

976 Housing, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Creek Construction 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR River City Builders & Millworks, Inc. 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodmark LLC 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Domus, LLC 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Farming 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feedmill TW Shop - SE 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Brigade Energy Services 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wild Rice Electric Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Roaring River Feed Mill 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0657 Williamsburg 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1108 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cobble Hill Health Center nursing home 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Moving Systems 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paint Valley Parts 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapheide Truck Equipment Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDowell-Craig Office Systems 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.