Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Pennsylvania

Philadelphia Enjoy House

Folcroft, PA · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Philadelphia Enjoy House runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Philadelphia Enjoy House: 15.4 TCR = 237% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Philadelphia Enjoy House safety composite

Philadelphia Enjoy House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Philadelphia Enjoy House: 12.7 → 14.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 19.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2021

Philadelphia Enjoy House's TCR rose 1.6 from 12.7 in 2019 to 14.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Folcroft, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 237% of ind

  • DART 14.3 DART
  • RANK #210/243
  • PHOTO CASLT - SOUTH LAKE T…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CASLT - SOUTH LAKE TAHOE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Philadelphia Enjoy House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Philadelphia Enjoy House averages 15.4 TCR (237% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Philadelphia Enjoy House TCR series: 2019=12.7 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=14.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Philadelphia Enjoy House falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 243 Express delivery services (exc employers in Pennsylvania.

Philadelphia Enjoy House (27 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Philadelphia Enjoy House
Philadelphia Enjoy House (27 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Philadelphia Enjoy House has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.3 14.3 5 0 0
2020 19.2 0.0 3 0 0
2019 12.7 12.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · PA · Folcroft

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 24 employers in Folcroft, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CASLT - SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JamRock Solutions LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 142 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 236 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Feeney's Wholesale Nursery 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunterstown Power Generation 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Liberty 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE LMBE Project Company LLC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR PA-01 4,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asendia USA- PHL 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bluestone Communications, Inc. 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bluestone Communications Inc. - Folcroft 112 FTE
NAT-TCR California Closets of Oregon 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Milford Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1049 Spokane Valley 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 165 ABC Supply Co., Inc 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Medina Campus 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milestone Senior Living Stoughton 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBS of Tennessee (Knoxville) 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.